🔗 Share this article

Transpired the manager was able to withstand losing against lower-league opposition. He weathered an important European final versus a particularly poor Tottenham teams in living memory. He could survive losing at home to West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, laying waste to the team's most promising academy products, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed one adversary with whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to dance. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous top-flight right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning 1994-95 season, Amorim took on the executive and seems to have missed. The most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a coach who often railed at his players for failing in one-on-one duels succumbing in the face of the white heat and formidable presence of one of the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

In truth, this entire painful saga seems to paint the director in a different perspective. It may have been easy, given his brief stint of experience with the Saints, to view Jason Wilcox as merely a functionary within the club's structure: a man who owed his position largely to his friendship with ex-colleague a fellow executive rather than any demonstrable skill. How wrong everyone was. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring United’s feted manager, just as he bested the unfortunate a previous executive earlier, he has demonstrated to be among football's strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect that the club's mid-table rivals are now justifiably concerned.

A Tactical Conflict Regarding System and Ideology

To illustrate, this was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim originally, played a key role in trying to persuade him to abandon his beloved formation. Unsurprisingly, these pleas were resisted. However, these judgements hold greater authority when issued from the mouth of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox might agree to explain his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked regarding why the coach is walking away with full compensation, with no penalty clause in place. The director seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – men like Jason Wilcox – function at a level beyond our own prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, probably all we would hear is a series of high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not quite equivalent to being ready to receive.

The Ultimate Power In Command

Naturally, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, merely executing the commands of his superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his desire for a back four. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for United to adopt data science and analytics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his minority ownership, he announced that United’s style to football “will be determined in this room”.

After all, Ratcliffe is an expert in these intricate footballing stuff, drawing from his background in petrochemicals and yachting. Above all he remains incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are superior: more insightful, more wise, more tactically astute, simply superior. Who else could one trust to manage an enlightened programme of austerity, the construction of a modern arena that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker?

The Modern Football Hierarchy: Executives Over Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent in top-tier of the game. Historically, clubs foolishly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, scouts – players themselves. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with ideas and energy to go into a club and see their vision through to completion. But how many companies have these guys set up? How many mass redundancies have they managed? Better by far to place genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the strategy by the directors and appoint a coach who can tailor their offering accordingly. If coaches were formerly chefs, they have become more akin to delivery personnel: not creating the food, yet finally accountable if it arrives poorly or leaks out of the box.

In the meantime, their job has become less about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face for a club they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into the Champions League and wins two medium-sized trophies, and essentially is dismissed for talking. Wilfried Nancy finds his standing damaged whereas the people who appointed him live to blunder indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Game: Accountability for the Few

And perhaps in a small way this represents corporate governance at work: the elevation of a privileged overclass who can never be wrong, whose decisions remain sacrosanct, whose mistakes can invariably be resolved by sacking without explanation. Hire the 3-4-3 coach only to fire him for playing excessively that system. Hire the project manager and then discard him for requiring excessive time. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for your new player acquisitions, for the reality that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.