Families' Distress Over Coastal Degradation Threatening Norfolk Burial Sites
Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.
A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards
Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.
A recent report on the situation details a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.
“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”
Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Haunted by the Past
One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.
“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”
“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”
A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy
Along the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.
“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”
In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”
Searching for Solutions and Clarity
The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.
Several families are calling for more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.
“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”
A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”
He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”
“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”
The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.